Drupal as a Catalyst for Community and Change

This piece was written for the February issue of the Drupal Newsletter

Nick Lewis wrote a great post last month about six conditions that lead to the formation of online communities. These conditions were, in short: a meeting place for people who didn't have one, a sense of shared ownership, at least one strong leader, a shared identity, an opportunity for personal gain, and entertaining conversations. While I generally agree with this list, Nick conspicuously leaves out one of the most crucial conditions that leads to the formation of online communities: the technology that the community uses to communicate, organize, and coordinate. While this might seem like a minor oversight, it is, in my eyes, a major one. There is a revolution afoot, and Drupal is one of the vanguards of this movement. But, I sometimes wonder how many of the people who are involved in the Drupal Project fully appreciate the truly awesome role they are playing in this changing world, just as the inventors and early proponents of the printing press probably didn't anticipate that their invention would supplant monarchies and the Church with Democracies, Communism, Socialism, Fascism, etc.

The consequences of new technology can be usefully thought of as first-level, or efficiency, effects and second-level, or social system, effects. The history of previous technologies demonstrates that early in the life of a new technology, people are likely to emphasize the efficiency effects and underestimate or overlook potential social system effects. Advances in networking technologies now make it possible to think of people, as well as databases and processors, as resources on a network.

...These technologies can change how people spend their time and what and who they know and care about. The full range of payoffs, and the dilemmas, will come from how the technologies affect how people can think and work together--the second-level effects" (Sproull and Kiesler, Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, 1991: 15- 16)  Quoted from John Arquilla and David Ronfeldt, Cyberwar is Coming!.

Back when the internet was just beginning to emerge, there was a lot of talk about the detrimental effects the internet would have on society. People were going to become less publicly social, less likely to make friends, more likely to spend their freetime in their pajamas, etc., etc. Some psychologists went so far as to come up with a new disorder for those who spent too much time online, Internet Addiction Disorder (IAD), and treatment centers were set up to help "cure" it. But, as so often happens with an emerging technology, most people failed to anticipate the societal level changes that this new technology would bring, which actually seem to have had the opposite effect as the IAD proponents expected. Two interrelated changes that can now be clearly seen are major shifts in the balance of power, espescially in the realm of communication and information control, and the emergence of thousands of communities, both on and offline, where none existed before. Most of the communities that have emerged seem to form around interests and ideology, though there is certainly a geographic aspect to them as well.

I became active in politics through Drupal, and active in Drupal through politics. In 2004 I, like many of my peers, was completely pissed off about the direction of our nation, and I wanted to do something about it. I was involved in the Wes Clark campaign for a while, but when that campaign sputtered to a stop I started to look for another way to get involved. Then, one night at a concert I met some folks from Music for America (MFA), which would have been "Music for Dean", if not for the demise of the Dean campaign, and which, like much of the activities around the Dean movement, was powered by Drupal. I've already written extensively about my experiences with Music for America and the impact that I thought online organizations could have on politics in my Masters Thesis, titled Keys to a Future Majority, so I won't cover it again here. But, one thing has become abundantly clear to me over the past 4 years: Drupal was key in getting me, and likely thousands of other potentially very active individuals, completely invested in the future of our nation. If not for the forums where I first started to chime in on how to make things happen, the many MFA events and ability to volunteer for them, or the permissions which allowed me to take on a bigger role within the organization, I likely wouldn't have become so invested and involved in political/social change.

After the premature demise of MFA, I started to look for other ways to make change, and one of those ways was setting new political Drupal sites. One of these sites, Young Philly Politics, serves as a good example of the effect Drupal can have on an online community. YPP was started on Blogger by my brother , Dan UA, soon after the 2004 election. He set this blog up because there was no place for younger Philadelphians to talk about local politics, and in fact, because of corporate takeovers and downsizing, there wasn't even much local political discussion happening in the local media at all. Through meeting people and word of mouth the site started to grow, and by the summer of 2005 there were 5 or 6 regular contributors, and posts would sometimes get up to 15 or 20 comments. In July of '05 we moved the site to Drupal, partly to give us more options for posting materials (for example, being able to have a teaser and a full post) and partly because of Drupal's unreal SEO capabilities (a discussion for another time). However, what I personally didn't anticipate was how quickly this move would impact the community on, or importance of, the site. On the first day the site went live one of Philadelphia's 17 City Council people wrote a diary, and by the time the last mayoral race came about, less than one year after the switch, the site had become one of the most important political sites in the city, with Mayoral, Council, and other political aspirants duking it out with activists, reporters and editors from the local papers, Philly machine pols, and really just about anyone who had an interest in the races. As of this writing, the site has had almost 4,000 blog posts, about 24,000 comments, and over 2,000 registered users.

Why Drupal?

Obviously, the entire information revolution, and the communities and changes that are born from it, are not progenies of Drupal alone. In fact, the entire "Web 2.0" trend is predicated on people being able to produce content in many different places and share it in many different ways. Communities spring up in different places, at different times, and for different reasons, and they still are going to want to share all sorts of information with others.  Drupal's flexibility and adaptability (as well as the low cost of entry) help it to seamlessly integrate with whatever new technologies emerge. In a sense, Drupal is an online meeting space not just for people, but for technologies as well. It seems that as soon as a new Web 2.0 site or service emerges, some developer comes up with a module which allows for easy integration with a Drupal site.

Second, because Drupal was advanced in the US by a community of activists, and it is maintained by an amazing community of developers, designers, marketers, etc., it is more oriented towards community-oriented sites, which makes it better suited than any other platform to provide the services needed in this networked world.

Third, because of Drupal's technical prowess, it has garnered the attention, and enjoyed the investments, of quite a few large corporations and organizations, who pay developers to perfect and improve upon their code, to the benefit of all. This means that community sites, both big and small, benefit from investments that they themselves could never make.

I am certain that I am leaving out other reasons which contribute Drupal's transformative abilities, but whatever other reasons there are, one thing is clear: Drupal is a catalyst for community and change. And while the fascination with the technical advances and efficiency gains will remain at the forefront of most discussions of the platform, we cannot lose site of the social level changes that Drupal is helping to bring about. The revolution may not be televised, but it is being blogged about, right now, and chances are, that site may be powered by Drupal.

Transparency and Leadership Key to Drupal's Success

Lots of good points. We are at a point in our culture where people have the capability of making their voices heard and the "media" or the powers that be can't reign in unwanted voices. And Web 2.0 technology has been an important part of facilitating this.

Specifically re: Drupal and "Why Drupal?" and also what's behind Drupal's success, I'd like to add a couple of points highlighting why Drupal has been so successful in order to better understand how it can be a "catalyst for community and change."

  1. Open Source context. It's implicit in what Alex wrote, but I wanted to be explicit about it. The open source process is very powerful in that chaos is thwarted because there is hierarchy: the project lead is where the buck stops. Balancing that is the ability of any person or group to fork the project (take the existing code at a moment in time, rename the project, and take it in a direction of their choosing). Society beyond those folks building software applications has a lot to learn from the process of open source. Wikipedia is probably the biggest example of an open source project applied to a non-code project. But many more experiments need to take place.
  2. Great leadership. Dries Buytaert had been a model leader. He accepts the cloak of ultimate responsibility. But he spends most of his time empowering others, facilitating reasoned conversation, listening and learning, and having the knack to speak up strongly and decisively at the right moments. Just one example from just a few days ago. This is Dries' response to a call by some Drupal developers to limit the ability of folks to flag code patches in the issues queue as "RTBC -- Ready to be Committed": Dries: "I want everyone to be able to approve patches... We should focus on removing barriers and red tape, not on introducing more." He just keeps inviting people in to participate in substantive ways. I don't know if this kind of leadership can be taught. But at least we can note a model when we see it.
  3. "Scratch your itch" approach. Drupal's from-the-ground-up modular approach encourages anyone who has "an itch" to create a module and extend Drupal's functionality. In this way, Drupal draws upon a huge pool of creativity without threatening the stability of the core code.
  4. Commitment to innovation. API changes come with every major release. Conventional wisdom would say this approach would drive away module developers who must make significant code changes to their modules for every major release. That same "wisdom" would say that folks contemplating adopting Drupal would shy away for fear that their sites would not be upgradeable because crucial modules may not be updated. These negative consequences to a constantly changing code have not been realized. The energy that gets released by significantly upgrading the platform has been a major energy force in mobilizing module developers to update to the new APIs.
  5. Transparency. The debates that go on about the direction of Drupal, what are the problems, etc. take place in the public sphere. Anyone can join the Drupal Development list serve. There is much talk of "transparency in organizations and government, but most "leaders" seem to be afraid of it. Transparency exists in Drupal. Supporting this transparency is a commitment to a work-ethic. it is very clear that what is rewarded in the Drupal community is work. Yes, good ideas are entertained, put up with -- but work, in the form of code, testing, documentation, providing support to users, are the truly valued activities. I think that is a mark of a truly healthy community.

Catalyst for community change indeed. Thanks for making the connection between progressive technology and social change. There is a lot that can be learned.

Shai

personal blog
(not finished) business web site

Drupal has gone too far

Drupal has gone too far enough to prove its worth to the users. People in the Drupal community are helping together to make Drupal the best CMS but unfortunately I've heard that they didn't win. :-)

Yes, I agree with you Jan.

Yes, I agree with you Jan. You said it right.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.